This Week in Social Media (TWISM)
This Week in Social Media (TWISM) is the premier daily briefing for social media professionals who need to stay ahead. Delivered 4x weekly to 70,000+ subscribers, we provide competitive intelligence, platform updates, and strategic insights that help marketers navigate the ever-evolving social media landscape. Our content covers algorithm changes, new features across major platforms, trending strategies, and actionable tips that readers can implement immediately.
Who reads this:
Our audience consists of active social media marketing professionals concentrated in the US market (90%): - 30% Marketing Directors/CMOs – Senior decision-makers with budget authority - 30% Social Media Managers – Practitioners implementing daily strategies - 23% Founders & Entrepreneurs – Business owners managing their brand presence - 17% Content Creators – Professionals building audiences across platforms Subscribers work at leading agencies and brands, including HubSpot, Agorapulse, and Wistia. They're actively seeking tools and strategies to enhance social media performance, with high purchasing intent and authority to make buying decisions.
Available Ad Packages
Choose an advertising package that fits your needs
Near the top of both emails (beehiiv + Substack). 100-200 words with your logo and image. 1 spot available per issue. 40,000+ guaranteed impressions across both platforms.
Minimum offer: $150.00
In the middle of both emails (main + Substack). 75-150 words. 1 spot available per issue.
Minimum offer: $75.00
Get a dedicated email about your offering sent to both beehiiv and Substack editions. Needs to be detailed and provide value to subscribers. For example, a product launch, a discount campaign, a case study, a tutorial, or a use case. Dedicated emails can be sent on Tuesdays or Thursdays (max. 1 per week).
Minimum offer: $599.95
Recent Issues
Check out our latest newsletter content
✍️ The *current* AI content rules for all 10 social networks
✅ 10 sets of AI content rules. Are you breaking any of them??
Joshua Parkinson
May 28, 2026 • Estimated Reading Time: 5 minutes
Over 49,000 marketing professionals are reading TWISM today!
<img src='https://www.vpdae.com/open/3656d9a6.gif?opens=1' width='1' height='1'>👀 Every Social Network just picked a side on AI Content… Are you compliant??
Welcome back to TWISM!
If you've used AI to draft, batch, or "10x" your social content this year, today's edition is the one to read twice.
On May 21, LinkedIn's Global Editorial VP Laura Lorenzetti posted a sentence that should be taped above every social manager's monitor:
"It's ok to use AI to help you write, but your posts and comments need to represent your voice and your perspectives. The ultimate value comes from the human behind the tool." (Social Media Today)
Translation:
✍️ AI as assistant — welcome.
👻 AI as ghostwriter — throttled.
All 10 major social networks are now enforcing their own version of this.
Below is a summary of each version, platform by platform.
See which links drive revenue.
UTMs show where traffic came from. Conversion Tracking shows what happened next.
See which links drive sign-ups, purchases, leads, and revenue across social, email, SMS, and QR codes — directly from your branded links.
✅ LinkedIn — Reach throttling for "generic" AI posts
LinkedIn isn't deleting AI content. It's suffocating it.
Per The Next Web, the platform's new "AI solving AI" classifier flags generic AI posts with 94% accuracy in early tests. Flagged posts get capped at first-degree contacts — your network only, no recommendations. The same system now hunts AI comments and bot profiles, with new filters letting users restrict their feed to verified profiles only.
Best AI use: AI-assisted drafts of your own thinking.
Worst: "Rewrite with AI" → post unedited.
—
✅ Facebook, Instagram & Threads — Label or get downranked
Meta runs one framework across all three apps: realistic AI imagery, video or audio must carry the "AI info" label, applied either by industry-standard metadata signals (C2PA) or by your own self-disclosure.
Per Meta's Transparency Center, unlabeled realistic AI content is downranked rather than removed.
Instagram tightened the screws on May 4 with an opt-in "AI Creator" profile label that reads "This profile posts content that was generated or modified with AI" and follows you across Explore and Reels (Social Media Today).
Mosseri's January warning was the prequel: AI mimicry of any creator's style is now trivial, so the platform is leaning hard on transparency.
Best AI use: AI for production assistance (editing, captions, ideation) plus accurate labeling of synthetic visuals.
Worst: Photoreal AI faces / fake "behind the scenes" content with no label.
—
✅ TikTok — Auto-labels and a 73% reach cliff
TikTok is the most aggressive enforcer.
Per its Creator Academy guidance and AuditSocials' 2026 rules breakdown, any AI-generated content that depicts a realistic person or scene must be labeled — via the in-app AI toggle, an on-screen sticker, or a description note. TikTok now uses C2PA Content Credentials + invisible watermarking to auto-detect, and it has already labeled 1.3 billion videos this way.
Here's the part nobody saw coming: if TikTok auto-labels you after you posted unlabeled, that's an immediate strike and a 73% reach suppression within 48 hours. AI-assisted scripts, captions and hashtags are exempt. The line is realism.
Best AI use: AI editing, AI scripts, AI translations.
Worst: Realistic AI avatars, voice clones, or "footage" of events that didn't happen, posted with no toggle.
—
✅ YouTube — Disclose realism, or face automatic labels (and worse)
YouTube's synthetic content policy requires disclosure when you alter a real person, real event, or real place to look authentic.
Production-side AI — scripts, ideas, titles, captions, B-roll — is exempt. The Studio toggle is called "Altered Content."
The "Altered or Synthetic" label now appears directly under long-form players and as an overlay on Shorts (Variety). Skip the disclosure and YouTube can apply a non-removable label, demonetize you, or worse: in this year's "AI slop" crackdown the platform deleted 16 channels representing 4.7 billion views and roughly $10M in annual revenue under its Inauthentic Content Policy (OutlierKit).
Best AI use: AI in the pipeline that supports a human-led creative point of view.
Worst: Templated, mass-produced AI "shorts factories" with no original voice.
—
✅ X / Twitter — "Made with AI" toggle, with revenue-share teeth
X added a "Made with AI" toggle (BuzzInContent) and is layering AI into Community Notes itself.
The platform doesn't prohibit AI-written posts — but for sensitive categories (conflict, elections, crisis), unlabeled synthetic media triggers a 90-day revenue-sharing suspension, permanent on repeats.
Best AI use: AI-drafted text, satire, clearly stylized AI imagery.
Worst: Realistic AI imagery of news events without the toggle.
—
✅ Pinterest — Auto-labels, plus user-controlled "see less AI"
Pinterest auto-detects AI Pins via IPTC metadata and its own classifiers, then labels them in-feed (Pinterest Help).
The big shift is user-side: in the Manage GenAI settings (Pinterest Newsroom), users can now opt to see fewer AI Pins in beauty, art, fashion and home decor — the four categories most polluted by AI slop.
Your AI Pin doesn't get banned. Users just disappear it.
Best AI use: AI lifestyle imagery clearly labeled, paired with real product photography.
Worst: All-AI moodboards in the four "opt-out" categories.
—
✅ Bluesky — Composable labels, no central penalty
Bluesky takes the opposite approach. There is no central reach algorithm to throttle you. Instead, community labelers apply tags and individual clients decide what to do with them. You won't get downranked by HQ — but a major labeler tagging your account can make you invisible to half the network.
Best AI use: Transparency-first AI use, opt-in labels.
Worst: Posting AI content in feeds whose curators have publicly banned it.
—
✅ Google Business Profile — AI replies encouraged, but moderated
The outlier!
Google is actively shipping AI: its new Reply to reviews with AI feature is rolling out in the US, Brazil and India (Search Engine Land).
AI-drafted replies are compliant — but every reply now passes through a new ReviewReplyState moderation queue (PENDING → APPROVED or REJECTED). Per ALMcorp, templated AI replies erode trust faster than no reply at all. Edit them.
Best AI use: AI draft → human edit with specifics from the review.
Worst: Mass-sending unedited AI replies.
✅ Schedule first comments
✅ Schedule a thread of comments
✅ Delay each comment by a custom time period 🤯
Post Planner gives you maximum flexibility with your scheduled comments — so you can:
Schedule comments that feel organic!
📓 The 5-step playbook for the next 30 days
Audit your AI ratio. Last 30 posts per channel — if more than half could've been written by any brand, your LinkedIn reach has already dropped and IG is next.
Switch "Rewrite with AI" to "Draft with AI, edit with you." That one workflow change is what every platform's policy is begging for.
Label realistic AI everywhere. TikTok toggle, YouTube "Altered Content," X "Made with AI," Meta "AI Info." The label costs nothing. Skipping it costs everything.
Pick one human signature per channel. Voiceover, on-camera moment, founder POV, BTS — the thing AI can't fake. That's your originality anchor.
For GBP: never send an unedited AI review reply. Add the customer's name, their issue, one specific fix. AI gets you to 80%; the last 20% builds trust.
—
☝️ The one-sentence version
Every major platform now rewards AI as an assistant and punishes AI as a substitute — and the cost of getting it wrong has moved from "fewer likes" to "no reach, no monetization, sometimes no channel."
Reply and tell me which platform's AI rule surprised you most.
—
📚 Sources
LinkedIn wants to limit the reach of AI-generated content — Social Media Today
LinkedIn cracks down on AI slop with 94% detection accuracy — The Next Web
Instagram's "AI Creator" Label Could Put AI-Heavy Pages on Notice — Android Headlines
Disclosing use of altered or synthetic content — YouTube Help
YouTube's AI Slop Crackdown: 4.7 Billion Views Wiped — OutlierKit
Pinterest rolls out new tools to give users more control over GenAI content — Pinterest Newsroom
Google Business Profile tests AI-generated replies to reviews — Search Engine Land
That’s all for today. Thanks for reading. Now…
Go BIG or go home!
~ Josh from “This Week in Social Media”
Disclaimer: Some links may be affiliate links that pay us commissions.
Was this newsletter forwarded to you?
If you have questions please email phil@adly.news